Friday, September 11, 2015

Juniper SFP Transceiver vs Third-Party Compatible SFP Transceiver

When setting up your network, the right choice of devices is very fundamental because these devices, such as SFP transceivers, have great effect on the performance of your system. In order to cut down the costs on the expensive SFP transceiver modules, many companies are seeking for a compatible SFP to use. For example, if your network contains Juniper routers, firewalls, and switches, you might think that only Juniper SFP branded transceivers will ensure that all of your equipment is compatible and functions optimally. However, that seemingly reasonable assumption could cost your company thousands of dollars. Compared to the compatible SFP transceiver produced by third-party companies, Juniper SFP transceiver comes with dramatically inflated price tags while a third-party compatible one is roughly 80 percent less expensive than Juniper branded SFP transceiver. Although price isn't everything, it's important to know that you're getting your money's worth. That calls for a comparison of what Juniper SFP transceiver has to offer next to a third-party compatible one.
Juniper Compatible 1000BASE-SX SFP Transceiver
Performance
Many people worry that the performance of a third-party compatible SFP is not as good as Juniper SFP. Their intuitive conclusion when looking for SFP transceivers to work with Juniper branded devices is that they need SFP transceivers of the same brand to ensure flawless functioning. They want to avoid errors in networks that could interfere with service or security. In fact, Juniper's own branded SFP transceivers aren't the only ones that work well with their other devices. Compatible third-party SFP transceivers are designed with the specifications of Juniper technology and function smoothly but have no problem with Juniper devices such as switches, firewalls, and routers. Just remember that Juniper SFP transceiver and a third-party compatible one have the same performance, so you needn’t necessarily buy Juniper branded SFP transceiver to run your system without glitches or snags.
Failure Rates
Price implies reliability, is it always true? When you pay more for a product, you must expect that higher cost has some added benefits attached. But it is not always the case. Sometimes you're just paying for the brand name. Third-party compatible SFP transceivers often have lower rates of failure than branded Juniper SFP transceivers, which makes them more reliable but with less money.
Warranty
Juniper offers a one-year warranty on their branded optical products, plus whatever coverage may be offered under your service contract, for which you must pay separately and these service contracts don't come cheap. But if you have a lot of experience in shopping around, you'll find that many third-party manufacturers of compatible SFP transceivers and resellers even offer significantly better guarantees. It's not hard to find a lifetime warranty for your compatible optical products.
Availability
Time is money. Everyone prefers to get products earlier rather than later. The last thing you concern when trying to construct or upgrade your network is to find out that the SFP transceivers you have paid are on backorder. That kind of situation often happens when you rely on a single brand for the products you need. Expanding your search to a third-party compatible one can make it easier to get your network up and running faster without having to wait for the parts to be restocked.
If you're still hesitant about trying a compatible SFP transceiver from a third party manufacturer, the best way to ensure that you're getting a reliable product at a good deal is to choose a vendor you trust, one with a proven track record of quality products and great customer service. Fiberstore is a professional manufacturer and supplier for optical fiber products including many compatible SFP optical transceivers. All these fiber transceivers are 100% compatible with major brands like Cisco, HP, Juniper, Nortel, Force10, D-link, 3Com,etc.

No comments:

Post a Comment